I’m sure in my excitement I will just spoil this so pre-spoilers just know that is one of the best movies of the year.
It’s certainly a horror movie but it also transcends the genre (or does what genre should do) to deal with eternal questions about families, community, tragedy, life and dealing with pain and death.
Ok now here come the spoiler parts.
As they were planning this thing I hope director Danny Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland threw themselves a little party when they decided on “Coming of Age tale after the Zombie Apocalypse.”
If we have done this before I missed it. And I’m willing to bet it’s never been done with the care and detail of this flick.
The first third of the movie is a walk in the woods with a boy, Spike (Alfie Williams), and his father, Jamie (Aaron Taylor Johnson). Now these are English woods and this is after the events of 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later so they are somewhat infested with zombies.
The rest of the world goes on but England is quarantined and alone. Brexit allegory or just what is required in a zombie movie? I’ll let you decide.
It’s important to note that you do not need to watch either film to enjoy this. I would suggest you watch 28 Days Later because it’s awesome and skip 28 Weeks Later. But all you need to know is that there are zombies and England is quarantined.
In this part of the film there is both adventure and dread. Some of it created by piping in Rudyard Kipling’s poem Boots as read by Taylor Holmes in 1915 and flashes of film footage of English soldiers and history. Archers, waiving flags, other things. I don’t have the kind of recall to tell you exactly.
Without dissecting it too much it’s grand when a movie does this. Boyle shows such swagger and confidence here because if anyone got pedantic about it “where is this coming from” it would take them right out of the movie.
But Boyle correctly assumes that the viewer will be having to much fun to care.
The only answer to this question that matters was given to Sean Astin while filming Lord of the Rings.
Astin asked cinematographer Andrew Lesnie where the light was coming from in a dark tower.
Lesnie replied, “Same place as the music.”
Exactly.
So the first third of this is a father and son adventure. Then there is a party at their home village. What I was struck by was how much love there was there and how much love Jamie has for his son. Now, there is clearly some creepy things going on in this village. Hints of The Wicker Man. Or maybe it’s just that cloistered English villages are inherently terrifying no matter how friendly the community seems.
Jamie is no hero as evidenced by his actions during the party. But just look how proud he is. He beams.
There is, in my opinion, a shaky start to the second half of the flick. While the movie does everything possible to explain Spike’s actions I had a hard time with it. It’s too much “idiot ball” for me. Something dumb that a character must do in order for the movie to continue. Of course, I’m also willing to admit that I am too conservative a person to have ever defied authority the way Spike does here.
But despite that caveat the rest of the movie is scary, disturbing and hopeful in a way that you just can’t anticipate.
Screenwriter William Goldman writing about Fargo said that the first part of the movie had too much crazy violence to the point that he wasn’t sure if he could get through it. But then Marge Gunderson, the police chief shows up, correctly assesses a triple homicide and then proceeds to begin her full investigation.
At that point he was able to sit back, relax and enjoy the rest of the flick. It helped that he knew she was married to one of the Coen Brothers and would likely not be at risk of the same terrible fate that befell some of the other characters.
I went through the same thing with 28 Years Later when Ralph Fiennes character finally shows up. “Oh he’s that sort of person. Whew. I’m good.”
In the final third of the movie we get the most important lessons the film has to teach.
Then there is a surprise sort of ending. And here we can probably have a debate. Because the ending of 28 Years Later is not an ending to the movie you have been watching but rather the set up to the sequel.
I liked it. But it’s an end credit scene. And it’s amusing to me that 28 Years doesn’t do an end credit scene where it should and Sinners treats the real end of the movie as an end credit scene.
Strange choices abound for the two best films of the year so far. Also, I don’t know what it says about me or us that we have a vampire film and a zombie flick as two best examples of filmmaking in 2025.
Perhaps this:
Great monsters never die and great filmmakers can always find new ways to light up the dark.









