• The Killer (1989)

    The Killer (1989)

    Watching The Killer again, this time on Tubi, though I really need to buy it. 

    Ok so this is always overshadowed in my mind by Hard Boiled (the greatest action movie of the 1990s) but The Killer might be better. 

    The love story is stronger, the connection between the killer and the cop is better and the action sequences … I had forgotten how amazing they are. 

    I think Chow Yun Fat looks cooler throughout Hard Boiled than he does here and that is a factor. I don’t think anyone looks as cool on screen as the characters in Hong Kong crime films in the late 80s and early 90s. 

    The guys in Heat, and Collateral are ice cold and sharp of course maybe and Al and his crew in Godfather 1 and 2 could rival the cops and gangsters from Hong Kong but, really, there’s nobody else who looks this stylish.

    I wasn’t prepared for how good Danny Lee is here. He’s the real heart of this thing and he carries it magnificently. 

    Also, John Woo’s camera prowls around like a hungry lion and everytime Chow Yun Fat flies backwards while simultaneously firing two guns I’m thrilled in a way that I can hardly find in any other sort of flick.

    Woo had a pretty good Hollywood career that included the high point of Face/Off but what he accomplished in his home country remains unmatched. And not just unmatched by his own work but also by nearly everyone else who imitated his style but couldn’t fly this close to the sun.

  • Caught Stealing

    Caught Stealing

    That Elmore Leonard thing is hard. 

    Caught Stealing is a serviceable entry in the crime genre. It’s got two, maybe three, really solid twists some interesting characters and once it starts moving it stays near the strike zone. 

    It definitely strives for that Elmore Leonard intersection of cool characters, crime mayhem and comedy. 

    I liked it but I didn’t love it though. First, the tone just shifts way too much. Is this a Hitchcockian thriller? You know, the wrong man caught up in a world of violence he doesn’t understand? 

    Is it a caper film? Is it a comedy? Is it about a man atoning for his biggest sin? 

    Unfortunately, it’s all of those things and a couple of more besides. 

    There is a plot turn really early on that sucked all the energy out of the proceedings. Then a twist a few scenes later kind of brought everything back and gave Regina King a better role. 

    BUT Spoiler: 

    Zoe Kravitz character, our protagonist’s girlfriend gets killed. 

    I don’t think the movie ever recovered from this and I think Aronofsky and screenwriter Charlie Huston should have done something else. Easy for me to say, I suppose. There are plenty of arguments to do it and it drives the movie forward and gives us a nice twist near the end. Also, there is something unique about Austin Butler’s Hank Thompson continually getting his friends killed throughout the proceedings. 

    But the time and place for such a thing is in revenge movies. And instead of Butler’s phenom baseball player stalking the guys who killed his girl with a bat he spends most of the movie trying not to get shot. 

    Again, killing the girl works in a different movie, maybe, but not the one where Matt Smith is playing a punk straight of central casting and complete with a Mohawk, a leather jacket and an inability to discharge an uzi properly. 

    Her death and my belief that they should have just put her in a coma so she could come back at the end reminded me of two classic movie moments. 

    The first is that Director Tony Scott overruled then screenwriter Quentin Tarantino who wanted Christian Slater’s Clarence Worley dead by the end of True Romance

    Tarantino is a movie genius but Scott was absolutely right to let Clarence and his lover Alabama escape all that violence and ride off into the sunset together. 

    The second thing was that in Stephen King’s Misery, evil Annie actually cuts poor Paul Sheldon’s feet clean off. In the movie she break’s his feet at the ankles. So at the end, when James Caan survives you see him walking with a cane. Broken perhaps but not completely changed. 

    Screenwriter William Goldman argued that a book audience would be fine with poor Paul losing his feet and a movie audience would have never forgiven the filmmakers or the flick itself if the main character as permanently disfigured. 

    I’m telling you, put Zoe in a coma and have her come back in the last reel on the beach with our hero and you got movie magic. Instead, you got, a noir story perhaps, a movie about a guy losing everything. 

    Except it’s just not quite that either. This movie is a single, maybe a double but it’s nowhere close to a home run. 

    Anyway, Regina King is great, and I liked seeing Leiv Schrieber and Vincent D’Onofrio even if they don’t get enough screen time. 

    It’s a wonderful to see Griffin Dunne and Carol Kane even if they only get one scene a piece. 

    Everyone is cooking but the meal never quite satisfies. It’s happens that way something’s. Elmore Leonard wrote 45 novels but in the end Hollywood only made three perfect movies from his life’s work. 

    This is no Get Shorty. But it’s a damn sight better than Be Cool.

  • Americana

    Americana

    I think this is one of the great films of the year. 

    Writer/Director Tony Tost takes a stab at writing about all the things he clearly loves, country and western music, crime thrillers, social issues, cowboys, native Americans and Robert Altman films. 

    It features the one of the most evil households I’ve ever seen on film and Sydney Sweeney singing the praises of some of the great women of country music. 

    Also, there’s a delusion kid with a bow and arrow. 

    If you follow Tost online you will not be surprised by his interests but it’s still a joy to watch a flick that focuses on a part of America that isn’t New York or Los Angeles. I honestly hope I never have to sit through another movie about how wonderful or horrible it is to be in the film industry. 

    The opening snatched me up and as it settled into the narrative found a nice balance between talking about Tost’s themes and winding through a twisty crime story. 

    The violence, when it happened, actually knocked my audience around. Something in the way it was filmed or blocked or just that it was surprising. It wasn’t gory, and it wasn’t out of left field. I think it was just that Tost put the work in to make you care about everyone in the narrative even the smaller players. So when something hurts almost any of them it’s like you are punched in the face. 

    To be fair there were a few people around who were only cannon fodder. But that was for late in the game and no movie has time to set up random bad guy number three. 

    Sydney Sweeney is out on a ledge with a unique acting challenge. She succeeds but it ain’t easy. Halsey nailed it. We don’t spend enough time with Zahn Mclarnon but as always he excels. 

    Paul Walter Hauser gets one of those Paul Walter Hauser roles where he’s a sweet but very dumb guy just trying to be loved. I hope someone gives him a meaty part as a rocket scientist in some future movie or television show. Give the guy a chance to show his range. But he’s very good in this and at this.

    I hope Tost gets to do a lot more movies mainly because there are few if any filmmakers who are willing to look at these parts of America with love instead of contempt. 

    Finally, I don’t know how much of this came from Tost’s childhood but if you pulled out his family album I would not be surprised to find young Tony in a photo wearing a wampum headband and carrying a bow and arrow.

  • Highest 2 Lowest

    Highest 2 Lowest

    Clearly, The New York tourism board should just fund every Spike Lee movie. 

    Lee’s Big Apple is a beautiful, impossible, fantasy. The city is his greatest love and I’m sorry to anyone else in his life but it ain’t even close. 

    Highest 2 Lowest is a remake of Akira Kurasawa’s High and Low. That flick was based on the book King’s Ransom by Evans Hunter under the pen name Ed McBain. 

    Given all these influences you might think that the movie would take on the flavor of someone or something else like spoiled milk too long in a refrigerator. But, this is a Spike Lee Joint and it is unmistakably a Spike Lee joint. 

    So yes, there will be talk of Black excellence and opinions on the world at the current moment. This isn’t Lee from Bamboozled or Jungle Fever as he is mostly in the mood to entertain you. The only people he knocks around are fans of the Boston sports teams. 

    And how great is it that Lee takes a bit of time, and some of Apple’s money, to kick fans of the Red Sox and Celtics in the face? 

    I hate the Yankees! The only good days in baseball are when the Yankees lose. The only good years are when they don’t win the series. May they never have good things. And I still loved this. 

    So while Spike’s enemies are not my enemies I appreciate his level of disrespect. Let your sports hate fuel you man. 

    I don’t know yet where I rank this in the Spike Lee filmography. The man made films that are actually life changing, and turned an entire culture in his direction a couple of times. This is not Malcolm X or Do The Right Thing. But it’s up there with Inside Man as a thrilling film that mostly wants to entertain you. 

    There are some folks here who can’t act or maybe just shouldn’t share the screen with Denzel Washington but they are mostly minor players. I didn’t let it get me down. There are actors who have been doing this thing for decades and couldn’t share the screen with Washington. There’s only a few people in the world who can get near him. And most of them have Oscars and usually star in films written specifically for them. 

    A$AP Rocky delivers the goods and is a worthy foe for Washington. Their scenes together are electric. The old lion can roar, we knew that, but the young lion prowled the stage with confidence and charm. 

    The money drop sequence, which gives us the cops, the crooks, enthusiastic New York sports fans, a Puerto Rico Day festival, a complicated plan involving the subway, and a collection of mopeds is a high point not just in this movie but in all of Lee’s amazing filmography. 

    You can almost hear him cackling in the background and saying, “Y’all wrote me off? Well here I am mother (expletive deleted).” 

    There is a conversation out here amongst the knuckleheads I see online that the first hour of this movie is not good. 

    It seems clear that one of the points Lee makes in the story is absolutely correct: TikTok, cell phones and AI is destroying a generation . It’s annihilating your brains. 

    Summaries are not stories. Plot points are not stories. Aura moments are not stories. 

    Stories take time. Lee uses his time to introduce the players, explain how the kidnapping mix-up will happen and reinforce how the unique characteristics of Washington’s character (the best ears in the music business) and Jeffery Wright’s character’s connections to an unseen criminal underworld will help them in the climax. 

    The green headband switch is something that used to happen in the movies all the time but almost never does anymore because no one wants to risk the TikTok audience tuning out and turning on their phones. If you were looking at your second screen while it was happening you missed it. 

    If something like that is explained at all in other movies it’s done in dialogue. Lee does it properly and gives you everything you need. 

    Also, in the first hour of this movie you get to see Washington, the greatest actor of his generation, play a wealthy man facing an internal conflict. 

    Let me just say, Washington with a meaty role talking his way through a decent conflict is more thrilling than any train fights or shoot outs. 

    Those moments are why we have movies. Anyone can do the money drop sequence (though hardly anyone can touch Spike Lee’s version of it) but Washington is one of one. Anytime we get him doing something like this it’s a joy and a treasure. 

    Do I praise Lee and Washington too much? Yeah, well, I think you praise them too little.

  • The Thicket

    The Thicket

    I was a young teenager when Jonah Hex: Two Gun Mojo, showed up on comic book shelves. I was a voracious reader but here was something completely unlike anything I had ever encountered. 

    Jonah was a western anti-hero created by writer John Albano and artist Tony DeZuniga in 1972. I don’t think anyone could argue that he was maybe one or two steps removed from Clint Eastwood’s poplar movie screen persona as the Man with No Name. 

    By the 1990s there no western heroes on the stand but Two Gun Mojo, written by Joe R. Lansdale with art by Timothy Truman started a mini revival of the genre. Lansdale and Truman reimagined Hex a bit and gave him supernatural villians and the book was, for a short time, the coolest thing on the stands. 

    The whole thing didn’t last long but Lansdale built a career that included books, and television and movies. 

    Mike Mignola, the creator of Hellboy, once said (I think) that his wife wanted him to just create something normal. Just draw superheroes or create a normal story and the cash will keep rolling in. Mignola, instead, created a hell creature that fought other hell creatures. Mignola later said (essentially) that he couldn’t do normal. As a writer and an artist his brain just wouldn’t work that way. 

    I think that applies to Lansdale as well. I mean, his biggest cultural hit was, for a time, Bubba Ho Tep. A book and later a movie (written and directed by Don Coscarelli) that posits that all those National Enquirer stories were true and Elvis never died, and he was now being stalked by a mummy while trying to live out his final days in a nursing home. 

    It was a minor hit and celebrated in the kind of fan circles I traveled in in 2002. But that was never going to be a a huge thing. Nobody was going to retire on their Bubba Ho Tep money. 

    His other successful stab at all of this is the Hap and Leonard book series. Eventually that was made into three seasons of television on The Sundance Network. A riveting crime show and frequently on critics best of the year of list. 

    But, consider the internet description of two main characters: Hap Collins, “a white working class laborer who spent time in federal prison as a young man for refusing to be drafted into the military and serve in the Vietnam War.” 

    His best friend is Leonard Pine, “a gay black Vietnam vet with serious anger issues.” Together they solve mysteries and fight crime. 

    Again, Lansdale has, as near as I can tell, built a nice career for himself with this and his other books. 

    But my goodness, much as I love this stuff, I would have to admit it’s an acquired taste. 

    While I’m rambling and before I go further let’s also recommend Cold in July a neo-western based on a Lansdale book and starring Sam Shepard and Don Johnson. You probably never saw it but it’s a cool slice of crime fiction. 

    Anyway, having proved my Lansdale bonifides and noting that I am always interested in his work even I didn’t make it to the theater last year to see The Thicket

    It was only in theaters for a few weeks, with no advertisements, and when I found it I couldn’t make the hour drive to the big nearby city to catch it. I got kids man. 

    It’s now on Amazon Prime and most of it is exceptional. Exactly the kind of tough talk and bloody mindedness you want in a movie where Peter Dinklage plays an old west bounty hunter. 

    As an actor he always delivers and here he gets to be a cowboy who reluctantly helps a young man (Levon Hawke) rescue his sister who was kidnapped by Cut Throat Bill (Juliette Lewis). Dinklage’s reluctance is more less based on a pretty good western trope. To paraphrase: “You haven’t seen violence, boy, and I have and it should be avoided at all costs.” 

    You know, that thing. As motivations go it’s a winner. 

    The other, is that the pay won’t be worth the risk. Again to paraphrase: “I might risk my life for something, but it won’t be some woman I don’t know and one third of $300.”

    That was another excellent bit of business. 

    When we meet Dinklage’s character someone is trying to make fun of his height and cheat him out of money owed. You can guess how that conflict ends.

    Meanwhile, Cut Throat Bill is mostly off in her own little movie doing an excellent job at being menacing, creepy and crazy. I suspect Juliet Lewis spent some time watching Javier Bardem as Anton Chigurh. 

    It’s a movie that falls into a particular category for me which is: if this is the kind of thing you like then I think you will like this thing. 

    It succeeds and I enjoyed it but I would also tell you it has modest ambitions. A decent exercise in genre work that squeezes some fun out of Dinklage and Lewis being old west killers.

    The movie cooks a bit when we hear a sermon from a doomed priest explaining Cut Throat Bill’s backstory. And again when her part of the tale concludes. Her final words in the movie is haunting.

    So the movie gets to a really top shelf sort of place. But it doesn’t get there often and it doesn’t stay there.

    Spoiler below: 

    The conclusion follows through with the warnings about how all this violence will end. And what the pursuit of righteousness in the face of evil might cost. 

    Ultimately, we are presented with a happy ending … for the survivors.

  • Alien: Romulus

    Alien: Romulus

    If they had hired a real actor to play Ian Holm’s character this would have been a solid Alien entry. 

    Doing it with CGI brings nothing to the table. If someone was making Godfather 2 today they would de-age Marlon Brando and DeNiro’s once in a lifetime performance as young Vito would be lost to the world. 

    What I’m trying to say is that the ghost in the machine threw me out of this film just as it was starting to cook. 

    Quit doing this. 

    The rest of this is fine. I’m not sure there’s any more meat on the bone for Alien as a franchise. The repeat of a famous phrase from the franchise in this flicks’ climax kind of proves the point. 

    But my interest in this and predator was never very strong. Make a good one and I’ll see it eventually. Make a bad one and it’s pretty much the same thing.

    The final section of the movie had our heroine battling the final boss and her ship’s levers which all have to be pulled so that she can do a thing which will save her and kill it. Two sci-fi movie classics come to mind. A sequence in Galaxy Quest where the viewers discover the space ship is very complicated for no reason at all.

    And this classic line from Spaceballs

    “Even in the future nothing works!”

  • Happy Gilmore 2

    Happy Gilmore 2

    Not being a film historian I just want to tell you how it appeared to me but I cannot swear by the veracity of what follows. 

    In the 1970s Burt Reynolds was one of the biggest stars in the world and capped off a hit and miss run with one of the biggest box office hits of all time with Smokey and the Bandit in 1977. 

    You might think, given his star power, that Burt would use his influence to make some great movies. 

    Instead, we got Cannonball Run, two Smokey sequels and eventually a pretty good (for its time) sitcom Evening Shade

    Speaking about this period frequent co-star Ossie Davis said Burt just wanted to make movies with his friends. 

    And that’s where Adams Sandler’s career has been, mostly, since he had a string of hits at the box office in the 1990s. Outside of the really rare flick Sandler is content to let Netflix pay for his vacations to interesting foreign countries and cut checks to his friends for cameos that mostly don’t do anything for whichever movie he happens to be making. 

    For the last 20 years for me at least it’s been notable when Sandler makes something decent (Murder Mystery, Hustle) instead of an unwatchable mess (Hubie Halloween).

    Uncut Gems is a heckuva flick but it belongs in an entirely different conversation about Sandler’s career. 

    With Happy Gilmore 2 everybody in the first one who is still alive gets to come back (no, I mean everyone). 

    There are jokes that work – John Daly made me snort a bunch, and jokes that don’t – just about anything with the evil golf league. 

    More of it works than I expected. I imagine my nostalgia for that period in Sandler’s career, and the corresponding period in my own life, carried me along. 

    It’s a little like a high school reunion. You notice how old your classmates have become but given how far along in the cycle you are you can just be happy most everyone is still here. 

    Sandler made some astonishingly funny movies. Hardly anyone is getting close to The Wedding Singer and 50 First Dates. And he’s also made a ton of dreck. 

    This is somewhere in the middle. If you have no affection for Happy Gilmore you should skip it. Even if you do remember Gilmore fondly this is nowhere near that comedy classic.  

    But, if you do decide to watch this, if you ever get down on it, just look up every time Verne Lundquist comes on screen. 

    That guy was having a blast.

  • Fantastic Four: First Steps

    Fantastic Four: First Steps

    We have officially entered an era where we are replacing jokey fun with sincerity.

    One the one hand this is about as good a movie as you could ever hope for for the Fantastic Four. On the other, like Superman, the characters carried so much baggage from four previous bites at the silver screen and a 60 year publishing history that this movie is swinging wildly in a new (and old) direction. 

    It’s strange to be in 2025 and watch something built on nostalgia for the 1960s but, again, of the available options this is probably the right one. 

    I think it was also a wise decision to turn most of the FF’s supervillains into either flash frame notes or flat out jokes, like the Mole Man. Would I have enjoyed three hour movie where you see the FF take on and defeat three or four of their biggest villains in 15 minute segments before getting to the Galactus main course? You bet! 

    But I’m not sure The Wizard or The Red Ghost is going to hold the attention of a general audience. A Paste-Pot Pete section tho … could have moved the needle. 

    Director Matt Shakman and a team of writers find a somewhat new way into the Galactus story even though it’s been done once on screen already and variations of it have been done in the comics since Stan and Jack delivered it in the 1960s. 

    When the central conflict was introduced I thought that the movie was on solid ground. 

    As I said about Superman I could show someone First Steps and tell them that this is mostly what a Fantastic Four comic felt like. Although only the Jack Kirby and Stan Lee ones. Almost anything that was invented after issue 100 is ignored. 

    And while whole sections of the MCU are built on his art and ideas this is the first real tribute and attempt at bringing a Jack Kirby joint to the screen. Galactus looks appropriately godlike and Kirbyesque. And that future Kirby tech and retrofuture design is all over the place. 

    FF and Superman show Hollywood taking the material as it is instead of thinking they know better than the people who came up with the stories that captured the hearts and minds of readers for generations. 

    Finally, when you do put kid Franklin in an FF uniform it does not say Fantastic 5. His shirt says 4 1/2. 

    Let’s get the big things right guys.

  • Mulholland Drive

    Mulholland Drive

    I think there are three ways to look at this film.

    The first is that it is a masterpiece. Certainly that’s what the majority of critics and other creatives think about it. the New York Times ranked it number two on their list of 100 best movies of this century.

    That’s one of the reasons why I watched it. Or watched it again. There is a possibility that I watched a DVD of this 20 some years ago and simply forgot everything about it.

    The second interpretation is that this is an emperor has no clothes moment. Where all of the critics and movie makers are wrong and this is a bad movie that the culture has decided is good simply to go along. We as a society are never so smart that we are more than 5 seconds away from Tulip Mania.

    The culture loves something until we all decide it was bad and we never loved it at all. We have always been at war with Eastasia! Mulholland Drive is a masterpiece!

    There is almost no performer, writer or director who doesn’t get dragged down eventually. It’s just that a precious few are able to rise back up.

    So this could be a bad movie and everyone else is wrong.

    The third option is that I am a stupid person. And you, out there reading this, you who also did not like the flick, you too could be unintelligent. Never discount the possibility that you are a dumb-dumb.

    There is a particular comic book writer that everybody likes. No I’m not going to name him. But his thing was to take really obscure references and thrown them in his comics. And like, if I have to be familiar with a particular panel of a Batman comic from 1955 in order to understand and enjoy your 2015 Batman comic I feel like the fault for my lack of enjoyment is on you and not me.

    It’s possible that I am an idiot but it is also possible that you wrote a bad Batman comic.

    Here’s how I feel right now about Mulholland Drive.

    I feel like there is no actual answer, no interpretation and no correct way to understand this film. 

    And that’s not because I’m too dumb to understand it. Though, again, that’s certainly possible. But because Lynch is having a go at us. He’s off camera laughing at us as we try to interpret his dream journal. 

    He’s hinting at an answer that isn’t there because it can’t be there because he doesn’t know either. 

    I can imagine him saying, “it’s just some scenes I thought would be weird or interesting and I filmed them and edited them somewhere close to the run time of a finished film.” 

    When I was done with it those French guys put it out in the world. 

    What does it mean? It’s sound and fury suckers. You figure out what it means. 

    If you believe IMDB someone gave David Lynch close to 20 million in 1999 money to make this film. And that’s certainly a triumph but it’s not an artistic triumph in my mind. It’s a triumph in the same way that DB Cooper got away with all that money when after he hijacked that airplane.

    In a decade or two I’ll watch Mullholland Drive again. We’ll see how I feel then.

  • Mountainhead

    Mountainhead

    The thing about Jesse Armstrong is that he is very interested in the worst people in the world. 

    The problem with that is that in order to watch his movie, Mountainhead, or his show Succession, you have to spend time with the worst people in the world. 

    And I see these people all the time in the news stories about them even when I don’t read their interviews or care about their lives or political opinions. I love social media too much and so I am forced to live with an algorithm that feeds me garbage. 

    It pays off because the crackerjack writing pays off. But it’s hard to get to the laughs when I desperately want to smack everyone all the time. 

    Succession only worked for me when they got to the second season. Because it takes time to get comfortable watching the horrors masquerading as human beings. 

    You have a lot less time, of course, to get comfortable with this group of homunculi. But when it finally gets going it’s sharp and funny and suitably evil. 

    I guess I give it a mild recommendation. If you are missing this particular brand of Succession themed entertainment here is a movie you might enjoy. 

    When Succession got hot and I discussed it every week with my buddy I took to writing down the best lines during the show so I could share them with him. (I have a terrible memory sometimes) 

    Anyway, here’s the best stuff. It’s spoilery so you have been warned. 

    “Let’s just call Dave and say, ‘Hey Dave, we’re thinking of killing a guy.’l

    “It’s your house dude. You’re the host.”

    “He can’t cut us he can only shave us.”

    “I might not be able to enjoy a sauna.”

    “The petroleum insurance policy.”